It’s not often that I hear of eDiscovery or predictive coding outside of the standard industry-related publications, but I’ll share an article in Fast Company that’s been making the rounds today. It’s an overview of how predictive coding has impacted the recent litigation between Samsung and Apple. Without predictive coding, the cost of the litigation would be exorbitant, but thanks to advances in machine learning, intent can more cheaply be deciphered from text and other eDiscovery sources.
Annual eDiscovery Cost Calculator
Contact us using the form below
*These fields are required.Powered by Salesforce CRM
Recent Blog Posts
- Gordon v. Kaleida Health – No, plaintiffs, you don’t get all that stuff. Let D do their job.
- AccessData’s Summation 5.0 released
- Pillay v Millard – failure to halt scheduled destruction leads to adverse inference.
- EORHB vs HOA (Hooters Part II) No need to share an eDiscovery vendor. No need to use TAR.
- Country Vinter v EJ Gallo – ESI Processing is NOT Making Copies